| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
 LWA is committed to providing individuals and businesses with practical, common sense, and cost effective solutions to today's pressing business and legal problems.
More Details...
practices
preventive law, in other words, we help clients avoid
lawsuits. If a lawsuit must proceed, we are fierce,
practical advocates with the clients' best interest
our top priority.
is
committed to providing individuals and businesses with
practical, common sense, and cost effective solutions
to today's pressing business and legal problems.
utilizes
a results oriented approach while providing its clients
with sound legal counsel.
More importantly, recognizes
that in today's fast moving world, business is not
simply conducted from 9am to 5pm, Monday through Friday.
Our attorneys are always available.
|
|
|
|
Lloyd Ward & Assocs., P.C. v. United States Tr. (In re Network Cancer Care, L.P.) , No. 05-11147 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 197 Fed. Appx. 284; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18103, July 19, 2006, Filed , RULES OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
Kelso v. Lyford Cay Mbrs. Club , No. 04-11512 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 162 Fed. Appx. 361; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 979, January 13, 2006, Filed , RULES OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
Mills v. Smith County , No. 03-41398 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 120 Fed. Appx. 551; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1890, February 7, 2005, Filed , RULES OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
Irontree Group LLC v. Kaung , CASE NO. 4:05cv434, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, SHERMAN DIVISION, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10615, February 12, 2008, Decided, February 13, 2008, Filed, As Corrected April 4, 2008.
Nat'l Architectural Prods. Co. v. Atlas-Telecom Servs. - USA, Inc. , CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-0751-G ECF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51182, July 13, 2007, Decided, July 13, 2007, Filed
Armstrong v. Atlas-Telecom Serv.-USA, Inc. , CASE NO. 4:06-CV-147 , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, SHERMAN DIVISION, 562
F. Supp. 2d 812; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19588, March 20, 2007, Decided , March 20, 2007, Filed
Admiral Ins. Co. v. Briggs , Civil Action No. 3:02-CV-0310-N , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION, 264
F. Supp. 2d 460; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14433, March 31, 2003, Decided , March 31, 2003, Filed
Admiral Ins. Co. v. Briggs , CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:02-CV-0310-P, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12030, July 2, 2002, Filed; July 2, 2002, Entered , Partial summary judgment denied by Admiral Ins. Co. v. Briggs, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14433 (N.D. Tex., Mar. 31, 2003)
Monroe v. Red River Valley Farms, Inc. , Civil Action No. 3:02-CV-0094-M, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7676, April 30, 2002, Decided , April 30, 2002, Filed; April 30, 2002, Entered
Barnett v. Mentor H/S, Inc. , CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:99-CV-1993-P, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION, 133
F. Supp. 2d 507; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1092, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed, Entered on Docket
In re Home & Hearth Colo. Springs, L.P. , CASE NO. 02-34843-BJH-7, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 4550, January 27, 2006, Decided
In re Network Cancer Care, L.P. , CASE NO. 02-39409-BJH-11, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION, 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2559, September 17, 2004, Decided
Humble Woods, L.L.C. v. Petrohawk Energy Corp. , No. 05-06-01623-CV, COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLAS, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 8358, October 23, 2007, Opinion Issued, Released for Publication November 16, 2007
Wynn v. DPR 2003 Trust , No. 05-05-01646-CV , COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLAS , 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4813, June 6, 2006, Opinion Filed , Released for Publication June 6, 2006
Gulf States Petroleum Corp. v. GE Capital Auto Lease , No. 11-03-00027-CV , COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, ELEVENTH DISTRICT, EASTLAND, 134 S.W.3d 504; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2704, March 25, 2004, Decided
Monroe v. Schlicting , No. 05-98-01341-CV, COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLAS, 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 2012, March 29, 2001, Opinion Filed , PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY BY COUNSEL OR BY A COURT. , Petition for review denied by, 09/13/2001Appeal after remand at Monroe v. Schlicting, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 3679 (Tex. App. Dallas, Apr. 30, 2003)
In re Monroe , No. 05-99-01758-CV, COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLAS, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 2159, March 31, 2000, Opinion and Order Issued , PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY BY COUNSEL OR BY A COURT
Monroe v. Hunsicker , No. 05-97-01942-CV, COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLAS, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 370, January 18, 2000, Opinion Issued , PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY BY COUNSEL OR BY A COURT.
Icom Sys. v. Davies , No. 06-98-00080-CV , COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, SIXTH DISTRICT, TEXARKANA, 990 S.W.2d 408; 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 1976, February 25, 1999, Submitted , March 24, 1999, Decided
Monroe v. Frank , No. 05-95-00922-CV, COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLAS, 936 S.W.2d 654; 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 3756, August 16, 1996, Opinion Filed
|
|
|
